While this blow to the ride-hailing giant’s business might come as a surprise to some, it has been brewing for over six years. Uber entered Brussels in 2014 with UberPop, where private individuals could register to transport people for a fee. But a year later, local taxi company Taxis Vert filed a lawsuit against it and the court ruled that such a service didn’t comply with regulations. Uber reformed its services in Brussels following the suit and has since only worked with drivers who have an VVB professional license — the same license held by limousine drivers. But that doesn’t seem to have appeased courts, as they’ve now ruled that the 2015 cease-and-desist order also applies to the VVB drivers who work for Uber.
What does this mean for Uber drivers in Brussels?
According to an official statement by the company, almost 2,000 drivers will loose “their opportunity to generate income.” “De facto this concerns 95 percent of our drivers,” told an Uber spokesperson to De Standaard. Following the news, many Uber drivers have taken to the streets in Brussels to protest the new ruling. “More than 2,000 drivers have to support their families, pay their rent and the credit for their car, just like all other drivers. But apparently we are illegal,” said a driver to local news outlet Bruzz. “Technology is advancing, but we just keep going backwards. That is not normal. I have no words for it.”
— Decio Denis Bernardo (@DecioBernardo) November 25, 2021 Laurent Slits, the CEO of Uber in Belgium, was understandably not happy about the decision. He made his stance crystal clear in a statement, calling out Brussels’ backwardness:
What does this mean for Uber’s future in Europe?
This latest clash in Brussels is just the latest one in a long line of incidents. The company has fought a series of legal battles across Europe over how it employs its drivers, how it fits within regulations, and whether it unfairly competes with local taxi associations. We urge the Brussels government to reform the sector quickly so that drivers can continue to work and provide livelihoods for their families. Let’s name a few examples:
In September, the Amsterdam civil court ruled that Uber drivers fall under the Dutch taxi drivers’ collective labor agreement — meaning they are entitled to the same employment benefits as taxi drivers. Uber was forced to adjust its practices in Germany in 2019 in order to comply with national regulations and avoid a country-wide ban. In 2017, the company was forced to briefly halt its services in Italy after a legal battle with the country’s taxi associations.
To put it simply, Uber’s growth in the European cities hasn’t been as easy as the company probably wished. The EU isn’t really in favor of the gig economy model Uber represents, and besides that, Uber must take into account that operating in gray regulatory areas won’t actually bring profit in the long term. Although it’s also fair for the company’s representatives to point out that legislative frameworks need to consider and adapt to current technological capabilities. But hopefully they don’t need to sacrifice people’s rights to do so.
